Our handling of the French for the past 50 years is truly remarkable. They were useless during WWII, yet we still gave them a permanent place on the Security Council. They reneged on NATO, yet we still treated them as allies and friends. They flame the fires of anti-Americanism at home, and we look the other way. We still look upon France as the France of Lafayette and Rochambeau, a France that was brutally murdered (for good and bad reasons) during the 1790s. Eventually, and hopefully before too late, we will realize that the France of the American imagination -- a great ally with beautiful women, great cheese, and plenty of wine -- does not exist. While it is true that there are two Frances, that of the elite (Paris for short) and that of the people (the Provinces), Paris runs the show, and it is Paris who we need to have the balls to stand up against. In Rumsfeld's remarks (as well as Perle, Powell, and Bush), I see an awakening to this reality, but time is of the essence. As the U.S. prosecutes its war on terror, the stakes increase, and we need to realize that Paris has answered the statement, "You are either with us or against us," with a resounding, "We are against them!" and treat them accordingly. France's turn as a player on the world stage has come to an end, and, like a drunk friend who needs to go home, we need to diplomatically remove them from the world stage before they do something really damaging.
UPDATE: Basically, the point is: there is no good reason for France to be considered a major player, so why is the U.S. allowing it to keep that position, especially considering the damage their actions are having on U.S. interests.
UPDATE: Basically, the point is: there is no good reason for France to be considered a major player, so why is the U.S. allowing it to keep that position, especially considering the damage their actions are having on U.S. interests.
